All eyes on Northback
This is a project with stakes that extend far beyond Alberta, with North American and global implications.
If Grassy Mountain proceeds, it could usher in a new era for Canada’s steelmaking coal industry, redefining regulatory standards, environmental practices, and Indigenous partnerships. This is a project with stakes that extend far beyond Alberta, with North American and global implications.
In Alberta’s Crowsnest Pass, Northback Holdings’ Grassy Mountain project is making waves. Positioned at the heart of Canada’s steelmaking coal region, this project has drawn intense scrutiny and serves as a potential pivot point for Canada’s role in global coal production. But with the industry and public watching, Grassy Mountain is far more than a local debate; it’s a case study in balancing economic opportunity, environmental responsibility, and public sentiment.
A Coal Renaissance with Regional Investment Support
The Grassy Mountain project promises significant economic benefits, aiming to reignite coal mining in a region historically defined by it. But Grassy Mountain is not alone—just minutes down the road, Elk Valley Resources (EVR) has invested heavily, establishing new offices in Sparwood, symbolizing their stake in the coal-rich Elk Valley. Further north, NWP Coal Canada’s Crown Mountain Hard Coking Coal Project near Elkford is also taking shape, adding weight to the argument that Canada’s steelmaking coal industry is on the brink of renewed expansion. Together, these investments underscore the opportunity for Canada to solidify its standing as a major player in steelmaking coal.
CPKC’s Overlooked Advantage in Rail Infrastructure
Much of the resource industry’s focus remains on pipelines, but Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) could prove to be Canada’s most powerful—and underutilized—export route. With CPKC’s recent acquisition of KC, Canada’s coal producers now have access to a transcontinental rail network spanning Canada, the U.S., and Mexico, enabling access to multiple ports across North America. This expansion positions Canada to seamlessly transport increased coal output to diverse markets beyond the Pacific, including Gulf and Atlantic routes. As North America’s only single-line rail network, CPKC presents an export solution that many in the industry have yet to fully consider. If Grassy Mountain and similar projects move forward, rail could facilitate unprecedented coal movement across the continent and offer a distinct competitive advantage on the global market.
Lessons from the Past, Promises for the Future
Despite the economic promise, Grassy Mountain has met significant pushback from environmental groups, local officials, and concerned residents. Past coal projects have left visible scars on Alberta’s landscapes, with shallow soils exposed, invasive species taking hold, and road-built sediment entering water systems. These impacts underscore the stakes for environmental stewardship. Northback has responded by emphasizing its commitment to water recycling, selenium management, and habitat conservation. But the question remains: can Grassy Mountain truly deliver on its promises, and will this project avoid the pitfalls seen in Alberta’s coal legacy?
Moreover, the location of the project in the headwaters of the Oldman River—a critical water source—and sensitive trout habitats has elevated scrutiny. Regulatory bodies are demanding stringent oversight, and Northback’s pledges of “progressive reclamation” and strict environmental protocols will be closely monitored to see if they align with reality.
Partnerships and Local Divisions
Indigenous and local perspectives add another layer of complexity. The Piikani Nation has raised questions around job guarantees and environmental protections, seeking a voice in the project’s impact-benefit agreement, while the nearby Yaq̓it ʔa·knuqⱡi’it First Nation’s unique agreement with NWP Coal Canada, granting them regulatory power over the Crown Mountain project, may set a new precedent for Indigenous oversight. At a community level, opinions remain divided; while some welcome economic revival, others fear the environmental cost and the impact on tourism.
An Industry-Wide Test Case
If Grassy Mountain proceeds, it could usher in a new era for Canada’s steelmaking coal industry, redefining regulatory standards, environmental practices, and Indigenous partnerships. This is a project with stakes that extend far beyond Alberta, with North American and global implications.
Rail could become the driving force behind Canada’s coal export potential, outpacing the hurdles faced by pipelines and offering a streamlined, coast-to-coast route to market. With CPKC’s infrastructure in place and major coal investments in the Elk Valley underway, Grassy Mountain is indeed a test case. Canada’s ability to manage, market, and regulate such a project will likely set a benchmark for future resource initiatives.
For now, all eyes are on Grassy Mountain. Success could unlock massive economic potential; failure, however, would reinforce the barriers resource projects face today. As the project advances through regulatory, environmental, and public scrutiny, it holds the power to shape the future of Canadian coal and set a global example in sustainable resource development.
–
Canada is a significant player in the global steelmaking coal industry, ranking as the world's third-largest exporter of metallurgical coal. In 2022, Canadian mines produced 47 million tonnes of coal, with 59% being metallurgical coal.
The proposed Grassy Mountain Coal Project by Northback Holdings aims to produce up to 4.5 million tonnes of processed coal annually over a 25-year lifespan.
Similarly, NWP Coal Canada's Crown Mountain Project is projected to produce approximately 3.7 million tonnes of metallurgical coal per year.
If both projects proceed as planned, they could collectively add around 8.2 million tonnes of metallurgical coal to Canada's annual production. This increase would enhance Canada's position in the global market, potentially narrowing the gap with leading exporters like Australia and the United States. However, the actual impact would depend on various factors, including global demand, market prices, and the successful implementation of these projects.
